RFC2196_CCNA学习资料_思科认证 - 雏鹰部落

x3 发表于 2003-8-25 19:46:09

RFC2196

Network Working Group B. Fraser Request for Comments: 2196 Editor FYI: 8 SEI/CMU Obsoletes: 1244 September 1997 Category: Informational Site Security Handbook Status of this Memo This memo provides information for the Internet community.It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Abstract This handbook is a guide to developing computer security policies and procedures for sites that have systems on the Internet.The purpose of this handbook is to provide practical guidance to administrators trying to secure their information and services.The subjects covered include policy content and formation, a broad range of technical system and network security topics, and security incident response. Table of Contents 1. Introduction....................................................2 1.1Purpose of this Work............................................3 1.2Audience........................................................3 1.3Definitions.....................................................3 1.4Related Work....................................................4 1.5Basic Approach..................................................4 1.6Risk Assessment.................................................5 2. Security Policies...............................................6 2.1What is a Security Policy and Why Have One?.....................6 2.2What Makes a Good Security Policy?..............................9

x3 发表于 2003-8-25 19:47:00

2.3Keeping the Policy Flexible..................................... 11 3. Architecture.................................................... 11 3.1Objectives...................................................... 11 3.2Network and Service Configuration............................... 14 3.3Firewalls....................................................... 20 4. Security Services and Procedures................................ 24 4.1Authentication.................................................. 24 4.2Confidentiality................................................. 28 4.3Integrity....................................................... 28 Fraser, Ed. Informational

x3 发表于 2003-8-25 19:47:30

RFC 2196 Site Security Handbook September 1997 4.4Authorization................................................... 29 4.5Access.......................................................... 30 4.6Auditing........................................................ 34 4.7Securing Backups................................................ 37 5. Security Incident Handling...................................... 37 5.1Preparing and Planning for Incident Handling.................... 39 5.2Notification and Points of Contact.............................. 42 5.3Identifying an Incident......................................... 50 5.4Handling an Incident............................................ 52 5.5Aftermath of an Incident........................................ 58 5.6Responsibilities................................................ 59 6. Ongoing Activities.............................................. 60 7. Tools and Locations............................................. 60 8. Mailing Lists and Other Resources............................... 62 9. References...................................................... 64 1.Introduction This document provides guidance to system and network administrators on how to address security issues within the Internet community.It builds on the foundation provided in RFC 1244 and is the collective work of a number of contributing authors. Those authors include: Jules P. Aronson (aronson@nlm.nih.gov), Nevil Brownlee (n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz), Frank Byrum (byrum@norfolk.infi.net), Joao Nuno Ferreira (ferreira@rccn.net), Barbara Fraser (byf@cert.org), Steve Glass (glass@ftp.com), Erik Guttman (erik.guttman@eng.sun.com), Tom Killalea (tomk@nwnet.net), Klaus- Peter Kossakowski (kossakowski@cert.dfn.de), Lorna Leone (lorna@staff.singnet.com.sg), Edward.P.Lewis (Edward.P.Lewis.1@gsfc.nasa.gov), Gary Malkin (gmalkin@xylogics.com), Russ Mundy (mundy@tis.com), Philip J. Nesser (pjnesser@martigny.ai.mit.edu), and Michael S. Ramsey (msr@interpath.net). In addition to the principle writers, a number of reviewers provided valuable comments. Those reviewers include: Eric Luiijf (luiijf@fel.tno.nl), Marijke Kaat (marijke.kaat@sec.nl), Ray Plzak (plzak@nic.mil) and Han Pronk (h.m.pronk@vka.nl). A special thank you goes to Joyce Reynolds, ISI, and Paul Holbrook,

x3 发表于 2003-8-25 19:48:34

CICnet, for their vision, leadership, and effort in the creation of the first version of this handbook. It is the working group's sincere hope that this version will be as helpful to the community as the earlier one was. Fraser, Ed. Informational RFC 2196 Site Security Handbook September 1997 1.1Purpose of This Work This handbook is a guide to setting computer security policies and procedures for sites that have systems on the Internet (however, the information provided should also be useful to sites not yet connected to the Internet).This guide lists issues and factors that a site must consider when setting their own policies.It makes a number of recommendations and provides discussions of relevant areas. This guide is only a framework for setting security policies and procedures.In order to have an effective set of policies and procedures, a site will have to make many decisions, gain agreement, and then communicate and implement these policies. 1.2Audience The audience for this document are system and network administrators, and decision makers (typically "middle management") at sites.For brevity, we will use the term "administrator" throughout this document to refer to system and network administrators. This document is not directed at programmers or those trying to create secure programs or systems.The focus of this document is on the policies and procedures that need to be in place to support the technical security features that a site may be implementing. The primary audience for this work are sites that are members of the Internet community.However, this document should be useful to any site that allows communication with other sites.As a general guide to security policies, this document may also be useful to sites with isolated systems. 1.3Definitions For the purposes of this guide, a "site" is any organization that owns computers or network-related resources. These resources may include host computers that users use, routers, terminal servers, PCs or other devices that have access to the Internet.A site may be an end user of Internet services or a service provider such as a mid- level network.However, most of the focus of this guide is on those end users of Internet services.We assume that the site has the ability to set policies and procedures for itself with the concurrence and support from those who actually own the resources. It will be assumed that sites that are parts of larger organizations will know when they need to consult, collaborate, or take recommendations from, the larger entity. Fraser, Ed. Informational RFC 2196 Site Security Handbook September 1997 The "Internet" is a collection of thousands of networks linked by a common set of technical protocols which make it possible for users of any one of the networks to communicate with, or use the services located on, any of the other networks (FYI4, RFC 1594). The term "administrator" is used to cover all those people who are responsible for the day-to-day operation of system and network resources.This may be a number of individuals or an organization. The term "security administrator" is used to cover all those people who are responsible for the security of information and information technology.At some sites this function may be combined with administrator (above); at others, this will be a separate position. The term "decision maker" refers to those people at a site who set or approve policy.These are often (but not always) the people who own the resources. 1.4Related Work The Site Security Handbook Working Group is working on a User's Guide to Internet Security. It will provide practical guidance to end users to help them protect their information and the resources they use. 1.5Basic Approach This guide is written to provide basic guidance in developing a security plan for your site.One generally accepted approach to follow is suggested by Fites, et. al. and includes the following steps: (1)Identify what you are trying to protect. (2)Determine what you are trying to protect it from. (3)Determine how likely the threats are. (4)Implement measures which will protect your assets in a cost- effective manner. (5)Review the process continuously and make improvements each time a weakness is found. Most of this document is focused on item 4 above, but the other steps cannot be avoided if an effective plan is to be established at your site.One old truism in security is that the cost of protecting yourself against a threat should be less than the cost of recovering if the threat were to strike you.Cost in this context should be remembered to include losses expressed in real currency, reputation, trustworthiness, and other less obvious measures.Without reasonable knowledge of what you are protecting and what the likely threats are, following this rule could be difficult.

x3 发表于 2003-8-25 19:49:55

1.6Risk Assessment 1.6.1General Discussion One of the most important reasons for creating a computer security policy is to ensure that efforts spent on security yield cost effective benefits.Although this may seem obvious, it is possible to be mislead about where the effort is needed.As an example, there is a great deal of publicity about intruders on computers systems; yet most surveys of computer security show that, for most organizations, the actual loss from "insiders" is much greater. Risk analysis involves determining what you need to protect, what you need to protect it from, and how to protect it.It is the process of examining all of your risks, then ranking those risks by level of severity.This process involves making cost-effective decisions on what you want to protect.As mentioned above, you should probably not spend more to protect something than it is actually worth. A full treatment of risk analysis is outside the scope of this document. and provide introductions to this topic.However, there are two elements of a risk analysis that will be briefly covered in the next two sections: (1) Identifying the assets (2) Identifying the threats For each asset, the basic goals of security are availability, confidentiality, and integrity.Each threat should be examined with an eye to how the threat could affect these areas. 1.6.2Identifying the Assets One step in a risk analysis is to identify all the things that need to be protected.Some things are obvious, like valuable proprietary information, intellectual property, and all the various pieces of hardware; but, some are overlooked, such as the people who actually use the systems. The essential point is to list all things that could be affected by a security problem. One list of categories is suggested by Pfleeger ; this list is adapted from that source: (1)Hardware: CPUs, boards, keyboards, terminals, workstations, personal computers, printers, disk drives, communication lines, terminal servers, routers. Fraser, Ed. Informational RFC 2196 Site Security Handbook September 1997 (2)Software: source programs, object programs, utilities, diagnostic programs, operating systems, communication programs. (3)Data: during execution, stored on-line, archived off-line, backups, audit logs, databases, in transit over communication media. (4)People: users, administrators, hardware maintainers. (5)Documentation: on programs, hardware, systems, local administrative procedures. (6)Supplies: paper, forms, ribbons, magnetic media. 1.6.3Identifying the Threats Once the assets requiring protection are identified, it is necessary to identify threats to those assets.The threats can then be examined to determine what potential for loss exists.It helps to consider from what threats you are trying to protect your assets. The following are classic threats that should be considered. Depending on your site, there will be more specific threats that should be identified and addressed. (1)Unauthorized access to resources and/or information (2)Unintented and/or unauthorized Disclosure of information (3)Denial of service 2.Security Policies Throughout this document there will be many references to policies. Often these references will include recommendations for specific policies. Rather than repeat guidance in how to create and communicate such a policy, the reader should apply the advice presented in this chapter when developing any policy recommended later in this book. 2.1What is a Security Policy and Why Have One? The security-related decisions you make, or fail to make, as administrator largely determines how secure or insecure your network is, how much functionality your network offers, and how easy your network is to use.However, you cannot make good decisions about security without first determining what your security goals are. Until you determine what your security goals are, you cannot make effective use of any collection of security tools because you simply will not know what to check for and what restrictions to impose. Fraser, Ed. Informational RFC 2196 Site Security Handbook September 1997 For example, your goals will probably be very different from the goals of a product vendor.Vendors are trying to make configuration and operation of their products as simple as possible, which implies that the default configurations will often be as open (i.e., insecure) as possible.While this does make it easier to install new products, it also leaves access to those systems, and other systems through them, open to any user who wanders by. Your goals will be largely determined by the following key tradeoffs: (1)services offered versus security provided - Each service offered to users carries its own security risks. For some services the risk outweighs the benefit of the service and the administrator may choose to eliminate the service rather than try to secure it. (2)ease of use versus security - The easiest system to use would allow access to any user and require no passwords; that is, there would be no security. Requiring passwords makes the system a little less convenient, but more secure.Requiring device-generated one-time passwords makes the system even more difficult to use, but much more secure. (3)cost of security versus risk of loss - There are many different costs to security: monetary (i.e., the cost of purchasing security hardware and software like firewalls and one-time password generators), performance (i.e., encryption and decryption take time), and ease of use (as mentioned above). There are also many levels of risk: loss of privacy (i.e., the reading of information by unauthorized individuals), loss of data (i.e., the corruption or erasure of information), and the loss of service (e.g., the filling of data storage space, usage of computational resources, and denial of network access).Each type of cost must be weighed against each type of loss. Your goals should be communicated to all users, operations staff, and managers through a set of security rules, called a "security policy." We are using this term, rather than the narrower "computer security policy" since the scope includes all types of information technology and the information stored and manipulated by the technology. 2.1.1Definition of a Security Policy A security policy is a formal statement of the rules by which people who are given access to an organization's technology and information assets must abide. Fraser, Ed. Informational RFC 2196 Site Security Handbook September 1997 2.1.2Purposes of a Security Policy The main purpose of a security policy is to inform users, staff and managers of their obligatory requirements for protecting technology and information assets.The policy should specify the mechanisms through which these requirements can be met.Another purpose is to provide a baseline from which to acquire, configure and audit computer systems and networks for compliance with the policy. Therefore an attempt to use a set of security tools in the absence of at least an implied security policy is meaningless. An Appropriate Use Policy (AUP) may also be part of a security policy.It should spell out what users shall and shall not do on the various components of the system, including the type of traffic allowed on the networks.The AUP should be as explicit as possible to avoid ambiguity or misunderstanding.For example, an AUP might list any prohibited USENET newsgroups. (Note: Appropriate Use Policy is referred to as Acceptable Use Policy by some sites.) 2.1.3Who Should be Involved When Forming Policy? In order for a security policy to be appropriate and effective, it needs to have the acceptance and support of all levels of employees within the organization.It is especially important that corporate management fully support the security policy process otherwise there is little chance that they will have the intended impact.The following is a list of individuals who should be involved in the creation and review of security policy documents: (1)site security administrator (2)information technology technical staff (e.g., staff from computing center) (3)administrators of large user groups within the organization (e.g., business divisions, computer science department within a university, etc.) (4)security incident response team (5)representatives of the user groups affected by the security policy (6)responsible management (7)legal counsel (if appropriate) The list above is representative of many organizations, but is not necessarily comprehensive.The idea is to bring in representation from key stakeholders, management who have budget and policy authority, technical staff who know what can and cannot be supported, and legal counsel who know the legal ramifications of various policy Fraser, Ed. Informational RFC 2196 Site Security Handbook September 1997 choices.In some organizations, it may be appropriate to include EDP audit personnel.Involving this group is important if resulting policy statements are to reach the broadest possible acceptance.It is also relevant to mention that the role of legal counsel will also vary from country to country. 2.2What Makes a Good Security Policy? The characteristics of a good security policy are: (1)It must be implementable through system administration procedures, publishing of acceptable use guidelines, or other appropriate methods. (2)It must be enforcible with security tools, where appropriate, and with sanctions, where actual prevention is not technically feasible. (3)It must clearly define the areas of responsibility for the users, administrators, and management. The components of a good security policy include: (1)Computer Technology Purchasing Guidelines which specify required, or preferred, security features.These should supplement existing purchasing policies and guidelines. (2)A Privacy Policy which defines reasonable expectations of privacy regarding such issues as monitoring of electronic mail, logging of keystrokes, and access to users' files. (3)An Access Policy which defines access rights and privileges to protect assets from loss or disclosure by specifying acceptable use guidelines for users, operations staff, and management.It should provide guidelines for external connections, data communications, connecting devices to a network, and adding new software to systems.It should also specify any required notification messages (e.g., connect messages should provide warnings about authorized usage and line monitoring, and not simply say "Welcome"). (4)An Accountability Policy which defines the responsibilities of users, operations staff, and management.It should specify an audit capability, and provide incident handling guidelines (i.e., what to do and who to contact if a possible intrusion is detected). Fraser, Ed. Informational RFC 2196 Site Security Handbook September 1997 (5)An Authentication Policy which establishes trust through an effective password policy, and by setting guidelines for remote location authentication and the use of authentication devices (e.g., one-time passwords and the devices that generate them). (6)An Availability statement which sets users' expectations for the availability of resources.It should address redundancy and recovery issues, as well as specify operating hours and maintenance down-time periods.It should also include contact information for reporting system and network failures. (7)An Information Technology System & Network Maintenance Policy which describes how both internal and external maintenance people are allowed to handle and access technology. One important topic to be addressed here is whether remote maintenance is allowed and how such access is controlled. Another area for consideration here is outsourcing and how it is managed. (8)A Violations Reporting Policy that indicates which types of violations (e.g., privacy and security, internal and external) must be reported and to whom the reports are made.A non- threatening atmosphere and the possibility of anonymous reporting will result in a greater probability that a violation will be reported if it is detected. (9)Supporting Information which provides users, staff, and management with contact information for each type of policy violation; guidelines on how to handle outside queries about a security incident, or information which may be considered confidential or proprietary; and cross-references to security procedures and related information, such as company policies and governmental laws and regulations. There may be regulatory requirements that affect some aspects of your security policy (e.g., line monitoring).The creators of the security policy should consider seeking legal assistance in the creation of the policy.At a minimum, the policy should be reviewed by legal counsel.

x3 发表于 2003-8-25 19:51:50

以上是局部章节 我个人觉得很经典 大家自己下下看看

x3 发表于 2003-8-25 20:00:32

看贴的要回

小熊发表于 2003-8-25 20:21:07

好长啊啊 天啊~~ 让我今晚12点后，慢慢看好了

丢丢发表于 2003-8-25 20:41:08

我是要大家下整个文看

小熊发表于 2003-8-25 20:52:56

给个连接~~

页: [1] 2

雏鹰部落's Archiver

RFC2196